- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-64/21: Action brought on 29 January 2021 — Mainova v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0064
62021TN0064
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.4.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/42
(Case T-64/21)
(2021/C 138/56)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Mainova AG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: C. Schalast, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the defendant’s decision of 17 September 2019 (Case M.8870);
—join the proceedings within the meaning of Article 68(5) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court with the actions concerning the same decision M.8870, which, on account of the substantive connection between them, are cumulative and form a single decision closing the proceedings;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The action against the Commission’s decision of 17 September 2019 declaring the E.ON/Innogy concentration to be compatible with the internal market (Case M.8870) (OJ 2020 C 379, p. 16), relies on a single plea in law which is, in essence, identical or similar to that raised in Case T-63/21, Stadtwerke Frankfurt am Main v Commission.