I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-473/22)
(2022/C 359/114)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi (Kütahya, Turkey) (represented by: M. López Camba and A. Lyubomirova Geleva, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gábor Darvas (Budapest, Hungary), Dorina Pap (Kiskunhalas, Hungary)
Applicants of the trade mark at issue: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative LAAVA mark — Application for registration No 18 209 861
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 May 2022 in Case R 1745/2021-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision to the extent that it maintains the rejection of the opposition and orders the opponent/appellant to bear the costs of the opposition and appeal proceedings;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi;
—order Gábor Darvas and Dorina Pap to pay the costs incurred by Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi.
—Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.