I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Article 56 TFEU - Freedom to provide services - Directive 2000/31/EC - Electronic commerce - Article 8(1) - Commercial communications service provided by a member of a regulated profession - National legislation prohibiting advertising for pharmacies and pharmaceutical outlets as well as for the activities thereof - Restriction - Whether justified - Protection of public health)
(C/2025/4251)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: U. Małecka and M. Mataija, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna and D. Lutostańska, acting as Agents)
The Court:
Declares that, by adopting Article 94a(1) of the ustawa – Prawo farmaceutyczne (Law on Medicines) of 6 September 2001, the Republic of Poland failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 8(1) of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce), and under Articles 49 and 56 TFEU;
Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C, C/3062/2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4251/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—