I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2217)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Osculati Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: C. Bacchini, M. Mazzitelli, E. Rondinelli and L. Seri, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Olymp Bezner KG (Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 December 2023, as corrected on 11 January 2024 (Case R 838/2023-4).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/2452, 8.4.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2217/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—