I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2024/3920)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Adina Alberts (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: V. Roș and A. Livădariu, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Techtex SRL (Oșorhei, Romania)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design Cardboard boxes [packaging] – Community design No 7 873 187-0001
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 March 2024 in Case R 1348/2023-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—primarily, grant the application for a declaration that the design at issue is invalid;
—in the alternative, refer the case back to the Board of Appeal for reconsideration;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to bear their own costs and the costs incurred by the applicant before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of essential procedural requirement and rules of law relating to the limits of the Board of Appeal when assessing the pleas;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(e) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3920/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—