I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-549/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Medicinal products for human use - Orphan medicinal products - Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Trecondi-treosulfan - Decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products - Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 - Concept of ‘satisfactory method’ - Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 - Error of law)
(2020/C 390/47)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate mbH (Wedel, Germany) (represented by: P. von Czettritz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)
Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2019) 4858 final of 20 June 2019 granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Trecondi-treosulfan.
The Court:
1.Annuls Article 5 of European Commission Implementing Decision C(2019) 4858 (final) of 20 June 2019 granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use ‘Trecondi-treosulfan’;
2.Orders the Commission to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 337, 7.10.2019.