- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-454/09 P: Order of the General Court of 28 June 2011 — van Arum v Parliament (Appeals — Staff Cases — Officials — Reports — Staff report — Reporting exercise for 2005 — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TB0454
62009TB0454
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.9.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 282/18
(Case T-454/09 P)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeals - Staff Cases - Officials - Reports - Staff report - Reporting exercise for 2005 - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
2011/C 282/35
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Appellant: Rinse van Arum (Winksele, Belgium) (represented by: W. van den Muijsenbergh, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: J. F. de Wachter, K. Zejdová et R. Ignătescu, Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 in Case F-139/07 van Arum v Parliament ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Mr Rinse van Arum is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament in these proceedings.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.