EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-21/08: Action brought on 8 January 2008 — Evets v OHIM (QWIK TUNE)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0021

62008TN0021

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/61

(Case T-21/08)

(2008/C 64/99)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evets Corporation (Irvine, United States) (represented by: S. Ryan, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

That the decision R 604/2007– 4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 5 November 2007 be set aside;

that an order be substituted that the application for restitutio in integrum was brought within the time-limits as prescribed by Article 78(2);

that the matter be referred back to the Fourth Board of Appeal for them to deal with the substantive issue as to whether all due care was taken to renew the trade mark concerned;

that the costs be borne by the defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative Community trade mark ‘QWIK TUNE’ for goods and services in classes 9 and 15 — application No 117 994

Decision of the Administration of Trade Marks and Legal Division: Refused the request for restitutio in integrum and declared the trade mark as deemed to have been cancelled

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal and declared the restitutio in integrum request as deemed not to have been filed

Pleas in law: The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-20/08, Evets/OHIM (DANELECTRO).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia