EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-538/17 P: Appeal brought on 13 September 2017 by Thomas Murphy against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 4 July 2017 in Case T-90/16: Murphy v EUIPO
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0538
62017CN0538
September 13, 2017
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.3.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 104/11
—
(Case C-538/17 P)
(2018/C 104/13)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Thomas Murphy (represented by: N. Travers SC, J. Gormley, BL, M. O’Connor, Solicitor)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Nike Innovate CV
By order of 30 January 2018 the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
—
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.