- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 April 2011. # European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Rail transport - Directive 2005/47/EC - Working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector - Agreement between sectoral social partners at European level - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period. # Case C-305/10.
ECLI:EU:C:2011:226
62010CJ0305
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-305/10)
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Rail transport – Directive 2005/47/EC – Working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector – Agreement between sectoral social partners at European level – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period
Re:
Action for failure to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt and/or notify, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions provided for by Council Directive 2005/47/EC of 18 July 2005 on the Agreement between the Community of European Railways (CER) and the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF) on certain aspects of the working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector (OJ 2005 L 195, p. 15).
Operative part
The Court:
1.Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2005/47/EC of 18 July 2005 on the Agreement between the Community of European Railways (CER) and the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF) on certain aspects of the working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;
2.Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.