- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-4/12: Judgment of the General Court of 5 December 2013 — Olive Line International v OHIM — Carapelli Firenze (Maestro de Oliva) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — International registration designating the European Community — Figurative mark Maestro de Oliva — Earlier national word mark MAESTRO — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Likelihood of confusion — Articles 8(1)(b) and 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TA0004
62012TA0004
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.1.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/20
(Case T-4/12)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - International registration designating the European Community - Figurative mark Maestro de Oliva - Earlier national word mark MAESTRO - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Likelihood of confusion - Articles 8(1)(b) and 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2014/C 24/34
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Olive Line International, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Aznar Alonso, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Carapelli Firenze SpA (Tavarnelle Val di Pesa, Italy)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 September 2011 (Case R 1612/2010-2), concerning an opposition procedure between Carapelli Firenze SpA and Olive Line International, SL.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Olive Line International, SL to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.