EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-255/08: Action brought on 16 June 2008 — Eugenia Montero Padilla v OHIM — Padilla Requena (JOSE PADILLA)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0255

62008TN0255

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

15.8.2008

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/65

(Case T-255/08)

(2008/C 209/115)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Eugenia Montero Padilla (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: G. Aguillaume Gandasegui and P. Linde Puelles, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: José María Padilla Requena

Form of order sought

Annul OHIM's decision of 1 March 2008 and order that the application for registration be refused in respect of Community trade mark ‘JOSE PADILLA’ for Classes 9a, 23a and 41a.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Eugenia Montero Padilla

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘JOSE PADILLA’ (registration application No 2.844.066) for goods and services in Classes 9, 25 and 41.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark ‘JOSE PADILLA’ (registration application No 2.844.066) for goods and services in Class 41.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Dismissal of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law: Incorrect application of Articles 4 and 7(1)(a),(b),(c) and (f) Article 8(1) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia