I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
13.1.2025
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark puma acoustics - Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA - Relative ground for refusal - No damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/189)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Puma Srl (Settimo Milanese, Italy) (represented by: E. La Malfa, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 December 2023 (Case R 1400/2021-1).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Puma SE shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Puma Srl.
3.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/189/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
*