EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-267/11: Action brought on 24 May 2011 — Video Research USA/OHMI (VR)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0267

62011TN0267

May 24, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/31

(Case T-267/11)

2011/C 211/65

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Video Research USA, Inc. (New York, U.S.A.) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 March 2011 in case R 1187/2010-2;

Remit the case to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) with a recommendation that restitutio in integrum be granted in respect of community trade mark application No 919324;

Order the defendant to pay the costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘VR’ — Community trade mark registration No 919324

Decision of the Trade Marks and Register Department: Rejected the request for restitutio in integrum and confirmed the cancellation of the Community trade mark registration No 919324

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 81 of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in the application of this article and in its assessment of the facts in holding that the applicant’s representatives had failed to exercise due care in the circumstances.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia