EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-277/23: Action brought on 22 May 2023 — Global 8 Airlines v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0277

62023TN0277

May 22, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/66

(Case T-277/23)

(2023/C 252/79)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Global 8 Airlines (Bichkek, Kirghizstan) (represented by: E. Novicāne, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the individual measure adopted by the European Commission (Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport) regarding inclusion of the two light business jets (‘the aircrafts’) owned by the applicant in the list subject to grounding ban under Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, in its entirety as it relates to the applicant (‘the contested decision’), of which the applicant learned on 20 March 2023;

order the defendant to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the defendant has improperly applied Article 3c of Regulation 833/2014 in relation to the applicant as a non-European Union incorporated entity operating with non-European Union aircraft outside the European Union.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant has improperly found the aircrafts to be under the control of the Russian individuals or entities.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision lacked any sufficient and adequate reasoning or justification to enable the applicant to understand it.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia