I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Union Registry - Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 - Record of a surrender of such allowances in that registry - Finality of transactions - Article 40 - Reversal of finalised processes - Article 70 - Surrender under a provision of EU law subsequently invalidated by the Court of Justice - Impossibility, for the operator, to recover the allowances concerned for the period in question - Validity)
(C/2025/3484)
Language of the case: Finnish
Applicant: Metsä Fibre Oy
Intervening party: Energiavirasto
The examination of the first question referred has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of the provisions of Articles 40 and 70 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 of 2 May 2013 establishing a Union Registry pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Decisions No 280/2004/EC and No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Regulations (EU) No 920/2010 and No 1193/2011, regarding the final and irrevocable nature of the transactions and the time frames for their reversal.
—
(1) OJ C 338, 25.9.2025.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3484/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—