I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Mundipharma AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: F. Nielsen, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ALK-Abelló A/S (Hørsholm, Denmark)
—Revoke the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 August 2008 in case R 1694/2007-4; and
—Order OHIM to pay the costs.
Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘AVANZALENE’ for goods in class 5 — application No 4 632 501
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited: Community trade mark registration No 3 331 444 of the word mark ‘AVANZ’ for goods in class 5
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal erred in its finding that there is a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.