- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-557/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 29 October 2013 — Hermann Lutz v Elke Bäuerle as administrator in the insolvency proceedings concerning the assets of ECZ Autohandel GmbH
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0557
62013CN0557
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.1.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 15/9
(Case C-557/13)
2014/C 15/12
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Defendant and appellant: Hermann Lutz
Applicant and respondent: Elke Bäuerle as administrator in the insolvency proceedings concerning the assets of ECZ Autohandel GmbH
Questions referred
1.Is Article 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1436/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings, [the Insolvency Regulation]) applicable if the payment challenged by the insolvency administrator of a sum attached before the opening of the insolvency proceedings was made only after the opening of the proceedings?
2.If the reply to the first question is in the affirmative: does the defence under Article 13 of the Insolvency Regulation also apply to limitation periods or other time-bars relating to actions to set aside transactions under the law which governs the dispute concerning the contested legal transaction (lex causae)?
3.If the reply to the second question is in the affirmative: are the relevant procedural requirements for asserting a claim for the purpose of Article 13 of the Insolvency Regulation also to be determined according to the lex causae or by the lex fori concursus?
Language of the case: German
(1) OJ 2000 L 160, p. 1