- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-346/16: Order of the General Court of 20 June 2017 — CSL Behring v EUIPO — Vivatrex (Vivatrex) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Vivatrex — Revocation of the earlier EU trade mark — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0346
62016TB0346
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.8.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 269/21
(Case T-346/16)(1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Vivatrex - Revocation of the earlier EU trade mark - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 269/30)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: CSL Behring AG (Berne, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Best, U. Pfleghar and S. Schäffner, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Vivatrex GmbH (Aachen, Germany) (represented by: F. Stangl, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2016 (Joined Cases R 1263/2015-4 and R 1221/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between CSL Behring and Vivatrex.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Each party is to bear its own costs.
(1) OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.