I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-218/00) (<a id="ntc1-C_2013071EN.01001802-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2013071EN.01001802-E0001"> (<span class="super">1</span>)</a>)
(Action for annulment - State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and requiring the recovery of aid paid - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
2013/C 71/28
Language of the case: Italian
Applicants: Cooperativa Mare Azzurro Soc. coop. rl (Chioggia, Italy); Cooperativa vongolari Sottomarina Lido Soc. coop. rl (Chioggia) (represented initially by: G. Boscolo, and subsequently by A. Boscolo, lawyers); and Ghezzo Giovanni & C. Snc di Ghezzo Maurizio & C. (Venice, Italy) (represented by: R. Volpe and C. Montagner, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (<a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:L:2000:150:TOC">OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50</a>).
1.The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance;
2.The action is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law;
3.Cooperativa Mare Azzurro Soc. coop. rl, Cooperativa vongolari Sottomarina Lido Soc. coop. rl and Ghezzo Giovanni & C. Snc di Ghezzo Maurizio & C. are to bear the Commission’s costs in addition to their own costs.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2013071EN.01001802-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2013071EN.01001802-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2000:302:TOC">OJ C 302, 21.10.2000</a>.)