- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Cases T-122/13 and T-123/13: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2014 — Laboratoires Polive v OHIM — Arbora & Ausonia (dodie) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark dodie — Earlier national word marks DODOT — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TA0122
62013TA0122
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.11.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 409/36
(Cases T-122/13 and T-123/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark dodie - Earlier national word marks DODOT - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 409/52
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Laboratoires Polive (Levallois-Perret, France) (represented by: A. Sion, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Arbora & Ausonia, SLU (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: R. Guerras Mazón, lawyer)
Re:
Two actions brought against two decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 November 2012 (Cases R 2324/2011-2 and R 2325/2011-2, respectively) relating to two sets of opposition proceedings between Arbora & Ausonia, SLU and Laboratoires Polive.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Joins Cases T-122/13 and T-123/13 for the purposes of the judgment;
2.Annuls the decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 November 2012 (Cases R 2324/2011-2 and R 2325/2011-2);
3.Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Laboratoires Polive;
4.Orders Arbora & Ausonia, SLU to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.