I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-79/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(State aid - Agreements concluded with the airline Ryanair and its subsidiary Airport Marketing Services - Marketing services - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Advantage - ‘Real need’ test - Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Right of access to the file - Right to be heard)
(2023/C 271/34)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland), Airport Marketing Services Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F.-C. Laprévote, V. Blanc, S. Rating, I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis and D. Pérez de Lamo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, J. Carpi Badía and C. Georgieva, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Maceroni and A.-L. Meyer, acting as Agents)
By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants, Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd, seek annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1671 of 2 August 2019 on State aid SA.47867 2018/C (ex 2017/FC) granted by France to Ryanair and Airport Marketing Services (OJ 2020 L 388, p. 1).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 110, 29.3.2021.
* * *
Language of the case: English