- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-580/13: Order of the General Court of 21 April 2015 — Real Express v OHIM — MIP Metro (real) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark real — Earlier national figurative marks Real and Real mark — Rejection of the opposition — Rule 19(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 20(1) of Regulation No 2868/95)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0580
62013TB0580
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 198/38
(Case T-580/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark real - Earlier national figurative marks Real and Real mark - Rejection of the opposition - Rule 19(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Rule 20(1) of Regulation No 2868/95))
(2015/C 198/52)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Real Express Srl (Romania) (represented by: C. Anitoae, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Rajh and J. Crespo Carrillo, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)
Re:
Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 September 2013 (Case R 1519/2012-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Real Express SRL and MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
2.Real Express SRL is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.