EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-828/21 P: Appeal brought on 22 December 2021 by European Union Copper Task Force against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 13 October 2021 in Case T-153/19, European Union Copper Task Force v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0828

62021CN0828

December 22, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.2.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/31

(Case C-828/21 P)

(2022/C 73/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Union Copper Task Force (represented by: I. Moreno-Tapia Rivas and C. Vila Gisbert, abogadas)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

annul the judgment under appeal;

issue a judgment on the substance of the action for annulment or, subsidiary, refer the case back to the General Court for judgment;

order the European Commission to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.

The General Court erred in law in relation to the scope of its judicial review and has breached the appellant’s right to an effective judicial protection.

The General Court infringed the principle of non-arbitrariness by failing to require a harmonized approach in the scope of application of PBT (persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity) criteria.

The General Court infringed the precautionary principle and the principle of proportionality.

The General Court breached the rules of procedure by dismissing the appellant’s request to appoint an expert.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia