EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-545/10: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 July 2013 — European Commission v Czech Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Transport — Directive 91/440/EEC — Development of the Community’s railways — Article 10(7) — Regulatory body — Competences — Directive 2001/14/EC — Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity — Article 4(1) — Charging framework — Article 6(2) — Measures intended to provide the infrastructure manager with incentives to reduce the costs of provision of infrastructure and the level of access charges — Article 7(3) — Setting charges for the minimum access package and track access to service facilities — Cost directly incurred as a result of operating the railway service — Article 11 — Performance scheme — Article 30(5) — Regulatory body — Competence — Administrative appeal against the decisions of the regulatory body)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CA0545

62010CA0545

July 11, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

31.8.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/5

(Case C-545/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Transport - Directive 91/440/EEC - Development of the Community’s railways - Article 10(7) - Regulatory body - Competences - Directive 2001/14/EC - Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity - Article 4(1) - Charging framework - Article 6(2) - Measures intended to provide the infrastructure manager with incentives to reduce the costs of provision of infrastructure and the level of access charges - Article 7(3) - Setting charges for the minimum access package and track access to service facilities - Cost directly incurred as a result of operating the railway service - Article 11 - Performance scheme - Article 30(5) - Regulatory body - Competence - Administrative appeal against the decisions of the regulatory body)

2013/C 252/06

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Šimerdová and H. Støvlbæk, Agents)

Defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, T. Müller and J. Očková, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Centeno Huerta, Agent)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, all provisions necessary to comply with Article 10(7) of Council Directive 91/440/EEC of 29 July 1991 on the development of the Community’s railways (OJ 1991 L 237, p. 25), and with Articles 4(1), 6(2), 7(3), 11 and 30(5) of Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure (OJ 2001 L 75, p. 29).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 4(1), 6(2), 11 and 30(5) of Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure, as amended by Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions;

2.Dismisses the remainder of the action;

3.Orders the Commission, the Czech Republic and the Kingdom of Spain to bear their own costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 38, 5.2.2011.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia