- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-358/19: Order of the General Court of 6 May 2021 — Groupe Canal + v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Television distribution — Decision making commitments binding — Withdrawal of the contested act — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0358
62019TB0358
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.6.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/23
(Case T-358/19) (*)
(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Television distribution - Decision making commitments binding - Withdrawal of the contested act - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 252/32)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Groupe Canal + SA (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) (represented by: P. Wilhelm, P. Gassenbach and O. de Juvigny, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, C. Urraca Caviedes and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission Decision of 7 March 2019 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40023 — Cross-border access to pay-TV), making legally binding the commitments given by The Walt Disney Company, The Walt Disney Company Limited, Universal Studios International B.V., Universal Studios Limited and Comcast Corporation, CPT Holdings Inc., Colgems Productions Limited, Sony Corporation, Warner Bros. International Television Distribution Inc., Warner Media LLC, Sky UK Limited and Sky Limited.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the French Republic.
3.The European Commission shall pay the costs, including those incurred by Groupe Canal +, with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.
4.Groupe Canal +, the Commission and the French Republic shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.
(*)
Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.
* * *
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140
15