- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-369/17: Action brought on 13 June 2017 — Winkler v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0369
62017TN0369
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.7.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 249/46
(Case T-369/17)
(2017/C 249/63)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Bernd Winkler (Grange, Ireland) (represented by: A. Kässens, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the defendant’s decision of 13 March 2017 on the applicant’s complaint and order the defendant to adopt a decision on the calculation of the capital value at the time of the registration of the applicant’s claim on 14 September 2011;
—in the alternative, order the defendant to pay compensation amounting to EUR 19 920,39, payable to the applicant’s pension account.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant puts forward three pleas in law:
1.First plea in law: infringement of the principle that action must be taken within a reasonable period, infringement of the principles of legal certainty and of fair procedure, and infringement of the obligations relating to information and consultation.
2.Second plea in law: infringement of the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and proportionality.
3.Third plea in law: failure to respect legitimate expectations.