- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-514/15 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — HIT Groep BV v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European prestressing steel market — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23(2) — Calculation of the amount of the fine — Upper limit of the fine — Total turnover in the ‘preceding business year’ — Reference to a business year other than the one preceding the adoption of the contested decision — Principle of proportionality)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CB0514
62015CB0514
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 364/9
(Case C-514/15 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European prestressing steel market - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 23(2) - Calculation of the amount of the fine - Upper limit of the fine - Total turnover in the ‘preceding business year’ - Reference to a business year other than the one preceding the adoption of the contested decision - Principle of proportionality))
(2016/C 364/03)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Appellant: HIT Groep BV (represented by: G. van der Wal and L. Parret, advocaten)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Van Nuffel, S. Noë and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Hit Groep BV shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.