- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-232/12: Action brought on 29 may 2012 — Wilmar Trading v OHIM — Agroekola EOOD (ULTRA CHOCO)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0232
62012TN0232
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.8.2012
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 243/21
(Case T-232/12)
2012/C 243/39
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd (Singapore, Singapore) (represented by: E. Miller, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Agroekola EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 March 2012 in case R 87/2012-1;
—Order OHIM to consider the appeal filed against the decision of the Opposition Division of 10 November 2011 on opposition No B001760043 and to process in the normal course.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ULTRA CHOCO’, for goods in classes 29, 30 and 31 — Community trade mark application No 9221111
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Singaporean trade mark registration T0113987B of the word mark ‘ultra choco’ for goods in class 29; European and Bulgarian non-registered trade mark ‘ULTRA CHOCO’, invoking Articles 8(3) and 8(4) of Council Regulation No 207/2009
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Deemed the appeal not to have been filed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(3)(a)(ii) and (b) and 8(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 of 13 December 1995 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).