EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-83/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2015 — Silvan v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — 2013 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant — Articles 43 and 45(1) of the Staff Regulations — Commission GIP — Plea of illegality — Comparison of the merits — Account taken of the staff assessment reports — Lack of marks awarded or analytical assessments — Wording of the comments)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FA0083

62014FA0083

September 22, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/48

(Case F-83/14)(1)

((Civil Service - Officials - 2013 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the applicant - Articles 43 and 45(1) of the Staff Regulations - Commission GIP - Plea of illegality - Comparison of the merits - Account taken of the staff assessment reports - Lack of marks awarded or analytical assessments - Wording of the comments))

(2015/C 363/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Juha Tapio Silvan (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by: D. de Abreu Caldas, M. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, and subsequently by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to the next grade (AST 10) in the European Commission’s 2013 promotion procedure.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Mr Silvan to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

OJ C 7, 12.1.2015, p. 47.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia