- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-220/21: Action brought on 23 April 2021 — Thomas Henry v EUIPO (Spicy Ginger)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0220
62021TN0220
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.6.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 217/69
(Case T-220/21)
(2021/C 217/87)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Thomas Henry GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of EU word mark Spicy Ginger — Application for registration No 18 093 014
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2021 in Case R 435/2020-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 7(2) thereof;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 7(2) thereof.