I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2017/C 357/31)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Mylène Troszczynski (Noyon, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the European Parliament of 14 June 2017 on the request for the waiver of immunity of Mylène Troszczynski 2017/2019(IMM);
—order the European Parliament to pay to Mylène Troszczynski the amount of EUR 35 000 by way of compensation for the non-material damage which she has suffered;
—order the European Parliament to pay to Mylène Troszczynski the amount of EUR 5 000 by way of reimbursement of recoverable costs;
—order the European Parliament to pay all costs in the proceedings.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 8 of Protocol No 7 on the privileges and immunities of the European Union (OJ 2010 C 83, p. 266) (‘the protocol’).
2.Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 9 of the protocol.
3.Third plea in law, alleging an infringement of the principle of equality of treatment and of the principle of good administration.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the rights of the defence have been infringed and that the contested decision is unlawful.