EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-550/17: Action brought on 12 August 2017 — Troszczynski v Parliament

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0550

62017TN0550

August 12, 2017
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

23.10.2017

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/23

(Case T-550/17)

(2017/C 357/31)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mylène Troszczynski (Noyon, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the European Parliament of 14 June 2017 on the request for the waiver of immunity of Mylène Troszczynski 2017/2019(IMM);

order the European Parliament to pay to Mylène Troszczynski the amount of EUR 35 000 by way of compensation for the non-material damage which she has suffered;

order the European Parliament to pay to Mylène Troszczynski the amount of EUR 5 000 by way of reimbursement of recoverable costs;

order the European Parliament to pay all costs in the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 8 of Protocol No 7 on the privileges and immunities of the European Union (OJ 2010 C 83, p. 266) (‘the protocol’).

2.Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 9 of the protocol.

3.Third plea in law, alleging an infringement of the principle of equality of treatment and of the principle of good administration.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the rights of the defence have been infringed and that the contested decision is unlawful.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia