I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-743/15) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 295/47)
Language of the case: German
Applicants: Vinnolit GmbH & Co. KG (Ismaning, Germany) (represented by: M. Geipel, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)
Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.
2.The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Vinnolit GmbH & Co. KG.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.