EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-409/08: Action brought on 24 September 2008 — El Fatmi v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0409

62008TN0409

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/54

(Case T-409/08)

(2008/C 301/90)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: El Fatmi (Vught, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Pulles)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

Declare Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 to be inapplicable and/or declare Council Decision 2008/583/EC of 15 July 2008 to be void, in so far as they apply to the applicant;

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant asks the Court to declare Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 to be inapplicable to him and Council Decision 2008/583/EC to be void, in so far as it applies to the applicant.

First, the applicant submits that the Council acted contrary to the requirements of Article 5 EC. The Council had no power, since there is no connection to third countries or to the common market.

Second, Articles 60, 301 and 308 EC do not confer any power to adopt the contested regulation.

Third, the Council acted contrary to Article 1(3) of Common Position 2001/931 of 27 December 2001 and infringed essential procedural requirements and principles of Community law, including the duty to state reasons. According to the applicant, the national decisions on which the Council also relies are not decisions adopted by a competent authority within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the Common Position or are decisions that have been annulled on appeal to the national courts.

Fourth, the Council has infringed the applicant's fundamental rights and in particular the right to respect for private and family life, the right to effective judicial protection and the right to property.

* * *

Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 70).

Council Decision of 15 July 2008 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2007/868/EC (OJ 2008 L 188, p. 21).

Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 93).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia