EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-53/12: Action brought on 12 February 2012 — CF Sharp Shipping Agencies Pte v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0053

62012TN0053

February 12, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

24.3.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/29

(Case T-53/12)

2012/C 89/48

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: CF Sharp Shipping Agencies Pte Ltd (Singapore, Singapore) (represented by: S. Drury, Solicitor, K. Adamantopoulos and J. Cornelis, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

Annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 (1) and Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (2) ab initio and with immediate effect insofar as it concerns applicant’s inclusion in Annex VIII to Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010; and

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that by stating that the applicant is an Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines front company, owned or controlled by the latter, the defendant has manifestly misstated the facts and committed a manifest error in the application of Article 16 (2) (d) of Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 by including the applicant in Annex VIII to the said Regulation.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant has infringed its obligations to give reasons contained in Article 296 TFEU and Article 36 (3) of Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010.

3.Third plea in law, alleging the defendant’s failure to state reasons has resulted in the infringement of the applicant’s rights of defence, in particular the right to be heard and the right to an effective judicial review.

(1) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11)

(2) Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia