I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-768/15)(1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - EU figurative mark RP ROYAL PALLADIUM - Earlier EU word mark RP - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 369/13)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: RP Technik GmbH Profilsysteme (Bönen, Germany) (represented by: P.-J. Henrichs, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Tecnomarmi Snc Di Gatto Omar & C. (Treviso, Italy)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 October 2015 (Case R 2061/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between RP Technik and Tecnomarmi.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders RP Technik GmbH Profilsysteme to pay the costs.
OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.