- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Opinion of Mr Advocate General Tizzano delivered on 16 January 2003. # Commission of the European Communities v French Republic. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 96/29/Euratom - Protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiation - Incomplete implementation. # Case C-483/01.
ECLI:EU:C:2003:35
62001CC0483
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL
delivered on 16 January 2003 (1)
((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 96/29/Euratom – Protection of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiation – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period))
5. Without denying the Commission's allegations, the French Government merely admitted in its defence that, upon the expiry of the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion, the provisions necessary for the transposition of the directive had still not all been adopted because the adoption procedure had taken longer than anticipated.
Conclusion
7. I propose that the Court should:
(1) declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 96/29/Euratom of 13 May 1996 laying down basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiation, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;
(2) order the French Republic to pay the costs.
—
1 – Original language: Italian.