- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-208/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 May 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Graz — Austria) — NK v MS, AS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Consumer rights — Directive 2011/83/EU — Scope — Article 3(3)(f) — Concept of ‘contracts for the construction of new buildings’ — Article 16(c) — Concept of ‘goods made to the consumer’s specifications or clearly personalised’ — Contract between an architect and a consumer concerning the drawing up of a plan for a new single-family house)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0208
62019CA0208
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 240/21
(Case C-208/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Consumer rights - Directive 2011/83/EU - Scope - Article 3(3)(f) - Concept of ‘contracts for the construction of new buildings’ - Article 16(c) - Concept of ‘goods made to the consumer’s specifications or clearly personalised’ - Contract between an architect and a consumer concerning the drawing up of a plan for a new single-family house)
(2020/C 240/28)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: NK
Defendants: MS, AS
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 3(3)(f) of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council must be interpreted as meaning that a contract between an architect and a consumer, according to which the former commits to establishing only, for the latter, a project for the construction of a single-family house and, in that context, to preparing plans, is not a contract for the construction of a new building, within the meaning of that provision.
2.Article 2(3) and (4) and Article 16(c) of Directive 2011/83 must be interpreted as meaning that a contract between an architect and a consumer, according to which the former commits to establishing for the latter, in accordance with the latter’s specifications and wishes, a project for the construction of a single-family house and, in that context, to preparing plans, is not a contract for the supply of goods made to the consumer’s specifications or clearly personalised, within the meaning of that provision.
(*) Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2020:140