I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-601/17) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Three-dimensional EU trade mark - Shape of a cube with surfaces having a grid structure - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods necessary to obtain a technical result - Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Second sentence of Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now the second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001))
(2019/C 432/42)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Rubik’s Brand Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Szamosi and M. Borbás, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG (Fürth, Germany) (represented by: O. Ruhl, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 June 2017 (Case R 452/2017-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Simba Toys and Rubik’s Brand.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Rubik’s Brand Ltd to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.