- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-180/23: Action brought on 5 April 2023 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Samar’t Pharma (Bl blue pigment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0180
62023TN0180
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.5.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 179/74
(Case T-180/23)
(2023/C 179/102)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: L’Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and S. Vandezande, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Samar’t Pharma, SL (Vilamalla, Spain)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Bl blue pigment — Application for registration No 18 338 656
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 January 2023 in Case R 1102/2022-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.