I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Word mark ZIPCAR - Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark CICAR)
(2009/C 220/29)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Zipcar, Inc. (represented by: M. Elmslie, Solicitor)
Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2008 in Case T-36/07 Zipcar v OHIM dismissing an action for annulment brought by the applicant for registration of the word mark ‘ZIPCAR’ for goods in Classes 9, 39 and 42 against decision R 122/2006-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 30 November 2006 rejecting the action against the decision of the Opposition Division partially refusing registration of that mark in opposition proceedings brought by the holder of the national word mark ‘CICAR’ for services in Class 39
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Zipcar Inc. is ordered to pay the costs.
*
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2009:220
15