EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court of 10 June 1965. # Etablissements Consten SARL v Commission of the EEC. # Case 56-64.

ECLI:EU:C:1965:55

61964CO0056

June 10, 1965
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61964O0056

European Court reports French edition Page 00556 Dutch edition Page 00571 German edition Page 00450 Italian edition Page 00572 English special edition Page 00382

Parties

IN CASE 56/64 SOCIETE CONSTEN, THE REGISTERED OFFICE OF WHICH IS AT COURBEVOIE ( SEINE ), FRANCE, APPLICANT, V COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, DEFENDANT,

Grounds

WHEREAS UNDER ARTICLE 37(2 ) OF THE STATUTE OF THE COURT ANNEXED TO THE EEC TREATY ANY PERSON ESTABLISHING AN INTEREST IN THE RESULT OF ANY CASE HAS THE RIGHT TO INTERVENE IN THAT CASE; WHEREAS THE INTEREST NECESSARY IN THIS RESPECT MUST NOT RELATE SIMPLY TO ABSTRACT LEGAL ARGUMENTS BUT TO THE ACTUAL CONCLUSIONS OF A PARTY TO THE MAIN ACTION; WHEREAS IN THE PRESENT CASE IN CONSIDERATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CONTESTED DECISION IN RELATION TO THE OUTCOME OF THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE FRENCH COURT BETWEEN THE CONSTEN AND LEISSNER COMPANIES THE ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE DEFENDANT CANNOT FAIL TO EXERCISE A DECISIVE INFLUENCE ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ABOVEMENTIONED CASE; WHEREAS THEREFORE THE POSITION OF THE APPLICANT IN RELATION TO THE OUTCOME OF THE PRESENT CASE IS SUCH AS TO ESTABLISH ITS INTEREST IN INTERVENING IN SUPPORT OF THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE DEFENDANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 37(2 ) OF THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EEC; WHEREAS IT FOLLOWS FROM THE FOREGOING CONSIDERATIONS THAT THE APPLICATION TO INTERVENE MUST SUCCEED;

Operative part

1 . THE LEISSNER COMPANY IS AUTHORIZED TO INTERVENE IN CASE 56/64 . A TIME LIMIT SHALL BE FIXED FOR THE LODGING OF THE INTERVENER'S WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE DEFENDANT; 2 . A COPY OF EACH PLEADING SHALL BE RESERVED ON THE INTERVENER BY THE REGISTRAR; 3 . THE COSTS ARE RESERVED .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia