I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 284/64)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Sattvica SA (Buenos Aires, Argentina) (represented by: S. Sánchez Quiles, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Herederos de Diego Armando Maradona (Buenos Aires)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU trade mark No 2 243 947 DIEGO MARADONA — Registration No T 019 473 761
Proceedings before EUIPO: Recordal in the files and in the Register
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2022 in Case R 755/2021-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and replace it with another decision recording the transfer of trade mark No 2 243 947 DIEGO MARADONA to SATTVICA SA;
—order the defendant to pay the costs, including those incurred before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
—Misapplication of Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.