EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-89/24: Action brought on 19 February 2024 — Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO — Homann Feinkost (Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0089

62024TN0089

February 19, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/2331

(Case T-89/24)

(C/2024/2331)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński sp.j. (Trzebiatów, Poland) (represented by: A. Brudnoch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Homann Feinkost GmbH (Bad Essen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’ — European Union trade mark No 17 305 947

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 December 2023 in Case R 287/2023-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

reject the request for a declaration of invalidity of the European Union trade mark Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’ No 17 305 947;

in the alternative, refer the case back to EUIPO for reconsideration;

order the EUIPO and the other party to bear the costs of the proceedings and reimburse the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia