- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-498/14 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — (Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.) v (Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility — Child abduction — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 11(7) and (8))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CA0498
62014CA0498
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 73/8
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — RG (*1) v SF (*1)
(Case C-498/14 PPU) (*1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility - Child abduction - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Article 11(7) and (8))
(2015/C 073/11)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: RG (*1)
Defendant: SF (*1)
Operative part of the judgment
Article 11(7) and (8) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, must be interpreted as not precluding, as a general rule, a Member State from allocating to a specialised court the jurisdiction to examine questions of return or custody with respect to a child in the context of the procedure set out in those provisions, even where proceedings on the substance of parental responsibility with respect to the child have already, separately, been brought before a court or tribunal.
(*1) Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.
(*1) OJ C 16, 19.1.2015.