EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-462/22, BM (Residence of the divorce applicant): Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — BM v LO (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Sixth indent of Article 3(1)(a) — Forum actoris — Condition — Habitual residence of the applicant in the Member State of the court seised for the entire period immediately before the application was made)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0462

62022CA0462

July 6, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

21.8.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/12

(Case C-462/22, (1) BM (Residence of the divorce applicant))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Sixth indent of Article 3(1)(a) - Forum actoris - Condition - Habitual residence of the applicant in the Member State of the court seised for the entire period immediately before the application was made)

(2023/C 296/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: BM

Defendant: LO

Operative part of the judgment

The sixth indent of Article 3(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000,

must be interpreted as meaning that that provision makes the jurisdiction of the court of a Member State to hear an application for the dissolution of matrimonial ties subject to the condition that the applicant, who is a national of that Member State, provides evidence that he or she has acquired a habitual residence in that Member State for at least six months immediately prior to the submission of his or her application.

Language of the case: German

(1) OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.

* * *

(1) Language of the case: German.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia