I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2022/C 37/64)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Preventicus GmbH (Jena, Germany) (represented by: J. Zecher, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark NIGTHWATCH — Application for registration No 17 996 007 — Refusal — Request for conversion of an EU trade mark application into a national trade mark application for the United Kingdom
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 September 2021 in Case R 1241/2020-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—orders the EUIPO to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the General Court and the costs incurred during the appeal and examination procedures before the EUIPO.
—Infringement of Article 139 (1) in conjunction with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the right to a fair and timely handling of the matter pursuant to Article 41(1) of the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union
—Infringement of the right to be heard pursuant to Article 41(2) of the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union.