- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-410/25: Action brought on 26 June 2025 – Vitabalans v EUIPO – Hasco TM (Ibumax-Lysin)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0410
62025TN0410
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/4475
18.8.2025
(Case T-410/25)
(C/2025/4475)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Vitabalans Oy (Hämeenlinna, Finland) (represented by: P. Eskola, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hasco TM sp. z o.o. sp.k. (Wrocław, Poland)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Ibumax-Lysin – Application for registration No 18 779 393
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2025 in Case R 1385/2024-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—reject the opposition filed by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal in its entirety;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the applicant’s costs in the present proceedings and in those before the Board of Appeal.
Plea in law
—Infringement of the Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4475/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—