I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2020/C 103/47)
Language of the case: Greek
Applicant: Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou (Chios, Greece) (represented by: A-E. Malami, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: Application for international registration designating the European Union of the word mark MASTIHACARE — Application for registration No 1388895;
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 November 2019 in Case R 692/2019-1
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—admit the present action;
—annul the contested decision;
—permit the registration under No 1388895 of the international trade mark ‘MASTIHACARE’ designating the EU, for all goods in Class 3;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs under Article 190(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the failure to state reasons in the contested decision of the Board of Appeal.
(1) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (OJ 2017 L 154, p. 1).