I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Civil service - Officials - Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance - Summary of the pleas in law in the application - No prior administrative complaint - Manifestly inadmissible)
(2008/C 223/116)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)
Defendant: Court of Auditors (represented by: T. Kennedy, J.-M Stenier and G. Corstens, agents)
Annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors to renew the mandate for its Secretary General for a period of six years starting on 1 July 2007 and, alternatively, of the decision of the Appointing Authority not to promote the applicant to the grade LA5 for the 2004 promotion exercise following the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 October 2006 in Case T-171/05 Nijs v Court of Auditors
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Mr Nijs is ordered to pay all the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 22 of 26.1.2008, p. 56.